| | |
| Paragraph 1 |
Again, see if he has placed what is a 'state' inside the genus
'activity', or an activity inside the genus 'state', e.g. by
defining 'sensation' as 'movement communicated through the body': |
| Paragraph 2 |
They also make a bad mistake who rank a 'state' within the
'capacity' that attends it, e.g. by defining 'good temper' as the
'control of anger', and 'courage' and 'justice' as
'control of fears' and of 'gains': |
| Paragraph 3 |
Sometimes, also, people state any kind of attendant feature as the
genus, e.g. 'pain' as the genus of 'anger' and 'conception'
as that of 'conviction'. |
| Paragraph 4 |
See, also, whether both naturally come to be anywhere in the same
thing: |
| Paragraph 5 |
Again, see if the species partakes of the genus attributed only in
some particular respect: |
| Paragraph 6 |
Sometimes also people place the whole inside the part without
detection, defining (e.g.) 'animal' as an 'animate body'; |
| Paragraph 7 |
See also if he has put anything that is blameworthy or
objectionable
into the class 'capacity' or 'capable', e.g. by defining a 'sophist'
or a 'slanderer', or a 'thief' as
'one who is capable of secretly thieving other people's property'. |
| Paragraph 8 |
Also, see if he has put anything that is precious or desirable for
its own sake into the class 'capacity' or 'capable' or
'productive' of
anything. |
| Paragraph 9 |
Or see if he has put anything that exists in two genera or
more into
one of them only. |
| Paragraph 10 |
Moreover, people sometimes in converse order render genus as
differentia, and differentia as genus, defining (e.g.)
astonishment as
'excess of wonderment' and conviction as 'vehemence of conception'. |
| Paragraph 11 |
Sometimes, too, people make the bad mistake of putting an
affection into that which is affected, as its genus, e.g. those who
say that immortality is everlasting life: |
| Paragraph 12 |
Again, see if to an affection he has ascribed as genus the
object of
which it is an affection, by defining (e.g.) wind as
'air in motion'. |