| | |
| Paragraph 1 |
Again, consider the case of things that bear a like relation to
one another. |
| Paragraph 2 |
If the opposite of the species be a privation, there are
two ways of
demolishing an argument, first of all by looking to see if the
opposite be found in the genus rendered: |
| Paragraph 3 |
Again, look at the negations of the genus and species and convert
the order of terms, according to the method described in the case of
Accident: |
| Paragraph 4 |
If the species be a relative term, see whether the genus be a
relative term as well: |
| Paragraph 5 |
Moreover, see whether the term fail to be used in the same
relation both when called by the name of its genus, and also when
called by those of all the genera of its genus. |
| Paragraph 6 |
Again, see whether the genus and the species be used in
the same way
in respect of the inflexions they take, e.g. datives and
genitives and
all the rest. |
| Paragraph 7 |
Again, see whether terms used in like case relationships fail to
yield a like construction when converted, as do 'double' and
'multiple'. |
| Paragraph 8 |
Again, see whether the species and the genus fail to be used in
relation to an equal number of things: |
| Paragraph 9 |
See, also, if the opposite of the species have the opposite of the
genus as its genus, e.g. whether, if 'multiple' be the genus of
'double', 'fraction' be also the genus of 'half'. |
| Paragraph 10 |
Seeing that of relative terms some are of necessity found in, or
used of, the things in relation to which they happen at any
time to be
used (e.g. 'disposition' and 'state' and 'balance'; |