| | |
| Paragraph 1 |
It sometimes happens that just as we are deceived in the
arrangement
of the terms, so error may arise in our thought about them,
e.g. if it
is possible that the same predicate should belong to more than one
subject immediately, but although knowing the one, a man may forget
the other and think the opposite true. |
| Paragraph 2 |
In the former case, where the middle term does not belong to the
same series, it is not possible to think both the premisses with
reference to each of the two middle terms: |
| Paragraph 3 |
By a knowledge of the universal then we see the particulars, but
we do not know them by the kind of knowledge which is proper to
them; |
| Paragraph 4 |
But he who thinks the essence of good is the essence of bad will
think the same thing to be the essence of good and the
essence of bad. |
HTML by 
created 1996/11/25 modified 2009/04/26