| | |
| Paragraph 1 |
The proposed categories have, then, been adequately dealt with. |
| Paragraph 2 |
We must next explain the various senses in which the term
'opposite'
is used. |
| Paragraph 3 |
(i) as correlatives to one another,
|
| Paragraph 4 |
(ii) as contraries to one another,
|
| Paragraph 5 |
(iii) as privatives to positives,
|
| Paragraph 6 |
(iv) as affirmatives to negatives. |
| Paragraph 7 |
Let me sketch my meaning in outline. |
| Paragraph 8 |
(i) Pairs of opposites which fall under the category of
relation are
explained by a reference of the one to the other, the reference
being indicated by the preposition 'of' or by some other
preposition. |
| Paragraph 9 |
(ii) Pairs of opposites which are contraries are not in any way
interdependent, but are contrary the one to the other. |
| Paragraph 10 |
Some intermediate qualities have names, such as grey and sallow
and all the other colours that come between white and black; |
| Paragraph 11 |
(iii) 'privatives' and 'positives' have reference to the same
subject. |
| Paragraph 12 |
To be without some faculty or to possess it is not the same as the
corresponding 'privative' or 'positive'. |
| Paragraph 13 |
To be in a state of 'possession' is, it appears, the opposite of
being in a state of 'privation', just as 'positives' and
'privatives' themselves are opposite. |
| Paragraph 14 |
That which is affirmed or denied is not itself affirmation or
denial. |
| Paragraph 15 |
It is evident that 'positives' and 'privatives' are not
opposed each
to each in the same sense as relatives. |
| Paragraph 16 |
That those terms which fall under the heads of 'positives' and
'privatives' are not opposed each to each as contraries, either, is
plain from the following facts: |
| Paragraph 17 |
In the case of 'positives' and 'privatives', on the other hand,
neither of the aforesaid statements holds good. |
| Paragraph 18 |
Again, in the case of contraries, it is possible that there should
be changes from either into the other, while the subject retains its
identity, unless indeed one of the contraries is a constitutive
property of that subject, as heat is of fire. |
| Paragraph 19 |
(iv) Statements opposed as affirmation and
negation belong manifestly to a class which is distinct, for in this
case, and in this case only, it is necessary for the one opposite to
be true and the other false. |
| Paragraph 20 |
At the same time, when the words which enter into opposed
statements
are contraries, these, more than any other set of opposites, would
seem to claim this characteristic. |
| Paragraph 21 |
In the case of 'positives' and 'privatives', if the
subject does not
exist at all, neither proposition is true, but even if the subject
exists, it is not always the fact that one is true and the other
false. |
| Paragraph 22 |
But in the case of affirmation and negation, whether the subject
exists or not, one is always false and the other true. |