| | |
| Paragraph 1 |
Substance, in the truest and primary and most definite sense of
the word, is that which is neither predicable of a subject
nor present
in a subject; |
| Paragraph 2 |
It is plain from what has been said that both the name and the
definition of the predicate must be predicable of the subject. |
| Paragraph 3 |
With regard, on the other hand, to those things which are
present in
a subject, it is generally the case that neither their name nor
their definition is predicable of that in which they are present. |
| Paragraph 4 |
Everything except primary substances is either predicable of a
primary substance or present in a primary substance. |
| Paragraph 5 |
Of secondary substances, the species is more truly substance than
the genus, being more nearly related to primary substance. |
| Paragraph 6 |
Moreover, primary substances are most properly called substances
in virtue of the fact that they are the entities which
underlie everything else, and that everything else is either predicated
of them or present in them. |
| Paragraph 7 |
Of species themselves, except in the case of such as are genera,
no one is more truly substance than another. |
| Paragraph 8 |
It is, then, with good reason that of all that remains, when we
exclude primary substances, we concede to species and genera
alone the
name 'secondary substance', for these alone of all the predicates
convey a knowledge of primary substance. |
| Paragraph 9 |
Further, primary substances are most properly so called, because
they underlie and are the subjects of everything else. |
| Paragraph 10 |
It is a common characteristic of all substance that it is never
present in a subject. |
| Paragraph 11 |
Yet this is not peculiar to substance, for it is also the case
that differentiae cannot be present in subjects. |
| Paragraph 12 |
The fact that the parts of substances appear to be present in the
whole, as in a subject, should not make us apprehensive lest
we should
have to admit that such parts are not substances: |
| Paragraph 13 |
It is the mark of substances and of differentiae that, in all
propositions of which they form the predicate, they are predicated
univocally. |
| Paragraph 14 |
All substance appears to signify that which is individual. |
| Paragraph 15 |
Yet species and genus do not merely indicate quality, like the
term 'white'; |
| Paragraph 16 |
Another mark of substance is that it has no contrary. |
| Paragraph 17 |
Substance, again, does not appear to admit of variation of
degree. |
| Paragraph 18 |
The most distinctive mark of substance appears to be that, while
remaining numerically one and the same, it is capable of admitting
contrary qualities. |
| Paragraph 19 |
If, then, a man should make this exception and contend that
statements and opinions are capable of admitting contrary qualities,
his contention is unsound. |
| Paragraph 20 |
But it is by reason of the modification which takes place
within the
substance itself that a substance is said to be capable of admitting
contrary qualities; |
| Paragraph 21 |
To sum up, it is a distinctive mark of substance, that, while
remaining numerically one and the same, it is capable of admitting
contrary qualities, the modification taking place through a change
in the substance itself. |
| Paragraph 22 |
Let these remarks suffice on the subject of substance. |