| | |
| Paragraph 1 |
The terms 'being' and 'non-being' are employed firstly with reference
to the categories, and secondly with reference to the potency or actuality
of these or their non-potency or nonactuality, and thirdly in the
sense of true and false. |
| Paragraph 2 |
But with regard to incomposites, what is being or not being, and
truth or falsity? |
| Paragraph 3 |
(b) As regards the 'being' that answers to truth and the 'non-being'
that answers to falsity, in one case there is truth if the subject
and the attribute are really combined, and falsity if they are not
combined; |
| Paragraph 4 |
It is evident also that about unchangeable things there can be no
error in respect of time, if we assume them to be unchangeable. |