| | |
| Paragraph 1 |
Since substance is of two kinds, the concrete thing and the formula
(I mean that one kind of substance is the formula taken with the matter,
while another kind is the formula in its generality), substances in
the former sense are capable of destruction (for they are capable
also of generation), but there is no destruction of the formula in
the sense that it is ever in course of being destroyed (for there
is no generation of it either; |
| Paragraph 2 |
Nor is it possible to define any Idea. |
| Paragraph 3 |
Again, if the Ideas consist of Ideas (as they must, since elements
are simpler than the compound), it will be further necessary that
the elements also of which the Idea consists, e.g. 'animal' and 'two-footed',
should be predicated of many subjects. |
| Paragraph 4 |
As has been said, then, the impossibility of defining individuals
escapes notice in the case of eternal things, especially those which
are unique, like the sun or the moon. |